Israel has rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed 15-point Board of Peace plan for Gaza, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu maintaining that Israel will not withdraw until Hamas fully disarms.
Eko Hot News reports that Netanyahu made the position known on Sunday, signalling continued disagreement over the proposed framework for Gaza and the conditions for Israel’s withdrawal.
The Israeli Prime Minister said his government would not accept an arrangement that allows Hamas to retain its weapons or military capabilities.
According to Netanyahu, the complete disarmament of Hamas remains a key condition before Israel would consider withdrawing from Gaza.
The position places Israel at odds with the proposal advanced by Trump’s Board of Peace, which is aimed at establishing a framework for Gaza’s future administration and security.
Trump’s 15-point proposal has been presented as part of broader efforts to create a political pathway for Gaza and address the territory’s humanitarian and governance challenges.
However, Netanyahu’s latest statement indicates that Israel remains focused on security guarantees before accepting any arrangement that would lead to a withdrawal.
The Israeli government has consistently maintained that Hamas must no longer possess the capacity to operate as an armed organisation.
Netanyahu’s comments therefore underline the importance Israel attaches to the disarmament issue in discussions over Gaza’s future.
The development could present a major challenge to efforts to build consensus around the proposed Board of Peace framework.
Any agreement involving Gaza would require the positions of Israel, Hamas, the United States and other regional and international stakeholders to be carefully considered.
The proposed plan has generated significant attention because of its potential implications for governance, security and reconstruction in Gaza.
For Israel, however, the question of Hamas’ weapons remains central to any decision concerning a withdrawal.
Netanyahu reiterated that Israel would not move away from its stated position without a clear commitment to Hamas’ complete disarmament.
The statement comes as diplomatic efforts continue over the future of Gaza and the possibility of establishing a sustainable political arrangement.
The United States has sought to promote its Board of Peace initiative as a framework for addressing the territory’s long-term challenges.
The proposal is expected to involve discussions on governance, reconstruction and security arrangements.
Israel’s rejection of the plan, as currently presented, could require further diplomatic engagement between Washington and Jerusalem.
It may also prompt additional consultations among regional partners involved in efforts to determine Gaza’s future.
Netanyahu’s position suggests that any revised proposal would need to address Israel’s security concerns before receiving its support.
The Israeli government has repeatedly emphasised that it wants firm guarantees against the continued existence of an armed Hamas presence in Gaza.
At the same time, international attention remains focused on the need for humanitarian support and long-term stability for Gaza’s population.
The disagreement over the Board of Peace plan therefore highlights the complex issues surrounding efforts to establish a new framework for the territory.
A successful arrangement would likely require agreement on several issues, including governance, security, reconstruction and the future role of Palestinian institutions.
The United States remains an important player in the diplomatic process, particularly because of its close relationship with Israel and its broader regional engagement.
Trump’s proposal represents an attempt to provide a structured approach to Gaza’s future, but Israel’s response shows that significant differences remain.
Netanyahu’s latest comments could influence the direction of subsequent discussions as officials examine possible adjustments to the proposed framework.
For now, Israel’s position remains that any withdrawal must be linked to the complete disarmament of Hamas.
That condition is likely to remain one of the most difficult issues in negotiations over Gaza’s future.
Diplomatic efforts may therefore focus on finding a formula that addresses Israel’s security demands while also creating a workable political and humanitarian framework for Gaza.
The coming weeks could provide further indications of whether the United States and Israel can narrow their differences over the Board of Peace proposal.
Regional governments and international organisations are also expected to continue monitoring developments and assessing the implications of the plan.
The situation underscores the difficulty of reaching a comprehensive agreement involving multiple parties with different priorities.
For Gaza, the outcome of these discussions could have significant implications for future governance, reconstruction and humanitarian assistance.
For Israel, the central priority expressed by Netanyahu remains the removal of Hamas’ military capabilities.
The United States, meanwhile, faces the challenge of securing broader support for its proposed framework.
Further diplomatic engagement will be required if the Board of Peace plan is to gain wider acceptance.
Until then, Netanyahu’s statement represents a clear indication that Israel is unwilling to accept a withdrawal arrangement without Hamas’ complete disarmament.
