United States President Donald Trump has suggested that the U.S. may take control of Greenland if diplomatic negotiations fail, citing the island’s strategic importance and mineral wealth. Trump made the comments during a White House meeting with oil executives on January 10, 2026, emphasising that the U.S. would act “whether they like it or not.”
Eko Hot News reports that Trump indicated a preference for negotiation but warned that if talks are unsuccessful, the U.S. might pursue “the hard way” to secure Greenland. He argued that control of the island is critical for U.S. national security, especially with growing activity by Russia and China in the Arctic.
Trump’s remarks have sparked concern among Denmark and European allies due to Greenland’s status as a Danish autonomous territory. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any unilateral U.S. action could strain NATO ties and affect longstanding security arrangements with Europe.
The president highlighted that the U.S. already maintains a military presence on the island and downplayed Denmark’s objections, stressing the strategic value of Greenland in Arctic security. He emphasised the importance of the island in countering foreign influence while maintaining diplomatic relations.
Diplomatic efforts are ongoing, with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio scheduled to meet Denmark’s foreign minister and Greenland representatives to discuss the situation. These talks aim to balance Trump’s assertive stance with traditional diplomatic engagement.
The comments have raised debates on U.S. Arctic strategy, national security, and international norms regarding respect for sovereign borders. Analysts caution that unilateral military measures could destabilise global alliances and provoke diplomatic tensions.
International leaders have urged the U.S. to respect Denmark’s sovereignty and uphold multilateral cooperation through NATO. Greenland’s mineral resources and strategic location make it a significant point of interest in global geopolitics.
Trump’s statements underscore the intersection of diplomacy, security, and strategic interests in the Arctic. Both diplomatic engagement and security planning are expected to continue in the coming weeks as nations evaluate their next steps.
